Team and Our Hands Up To HELP ONE Lawyer in YOKOHAMA.

Hilasol ask that Be Team and Our Hands Up To HELP ONE Lawyer in YOKOHAMA.

We ask Mr. Yamato Eguchi for trial because of the representation. 

Our law firm is disappointed with a court case against his honor lawyer, Yamato Eguchi. 

We ask his Honor, Tamura Taki, that “not guilty” is Fair. 

His Honor Judge should be a fair mediator and a water rescuer who should pay close attention. 

We are Special One who is planned to exist in the constitution. 

We think that The right of defense is also the right of a lawyer. 

In the first place, the secret of interviewing a lawyer should be strongly protected by the constitution as a confidentiality privilege. 

The interview is not for the suspect. 

It is unfair to create a dilemma for him in a court where the contents of the interview of a counsel with his secret privilege are disclosed in court. 

The defense under the purpose of protecting the president from "Atonement" is not a conspiracy crime. 

Nevertheless, perjury against police officers should not be a crime. 

Moreover, if the advice to the lawyer is determined to be a crime, the defense counsel always has a dilemma that cannot be countered against prosecution or police tricks. 

This is a TRICK for defeating the actual court insults and prejudice against the presiding judge. 

What is infringed on "the right to defend the lawyer's right" that ...

Confronts the state power that the lawyer is guilty of "the conspiracy joint criminal of conspiracy to conceal the criminal"?. 

This is a malicious attack against a lawyer by the prosecution. 

Lawyers should try their best to combat the prosecution and police-trick. 

We ask that the Daini Tokyo Bar Association should be regarded as a serious business disruption.  

The Daini Tokyo Bar Association should be raised to support the victory in the trial. 

Specifically, We ask that his glory, the chairman of the bar association, and Fumitaka Sekiya should Represent him as the chief attorney for Mr.Eguchi. 

In short, the case is that the president lent a car to the employee and that the employee drove the driver. 

With this suspicion, the president could be questioned as a conspiracy co-criminal for unlicensed driving. 

Therefore, We ask that Mr. Eguchi performed appropriate defense activities. 

There was a person who might be criminalized. 

In response, Eguchi just gave legal advice as a lawyer. 

This is not a crime, nor is it involved in the execution of the crime. 

The reason why He was arrested and was a problem was that the employee testified in the trial testimony that "Attorney Eguchi was ordered to solicit". 

However, defendants frequently lie in the courts of glorious judges. 

The only reason why a prosecutor arrests an attorney and charges the president and the attorney on the basis of that is just a trick that the prosecution and the police have organized. 

He has testified that he has heard & think from the president did not know that the employee was unlicensed. 

It is inevitable to give legal advice to a president who did not know that the defense counsel would not know. 

If the president says that he knew, he would advise the president to speak like this. 

"I will exercise my right to stay silent with the advice of a lawyer." 

It is unlikely that a lawyer will break his lawyer ethics. 

Managers don't have to think about the risk of crushing a company for a single employee. 

Then it ’s a “detective reasoning game”.  The lawyer's perception at the beginning of the defense of the prosecutor and He will be a problem.  He seems to be a quiz show that asks about the “intention” that the president says whether the employee has a license or not. Will the prosecution and police have a quiz show in a glorious court? 

Incredibly stupid and insulting the glory of the presiding judge.  His glorious general manager must know the difference between legal standards, prosecution and police tricks.  At the end of the day, it is a theological debate of the water splash theory. 

What is the “conspiracy of conspiracy to conceal criminals”? 

The logic, such as conspiracy for offenders who do not have a regular offense, has jumped over logic too much.  It is a rule that a criminal concealment offense is not punished.  Clearly the prosecution is Mistake.  The president has also been prosecuted even though it is nonpunishable.  Certainly, if a third party is involved in the course, the normal offender is an interpretation that conspires to conceal the criminal. 

However, View that there are few opinions example and crimes against normal criminals cannot be established is promising yet.

His case with little evidence is determined by interpretation.  You should not rule on interpretation of guilt or innocence.  If it depends on the interpretation, it is evidence that the prosecution failed to prove.  Prosecution and police argument are Clearly tricks at the student level.  Surely he was doing an act of arguing about a trial that was actually in progress on television, which was in ethical rules and in trouble. 

This is a violation of ethics against the ethics of the American Law of Ethics.  At the morning show, outfield lawyers who had no access to evidence should have rigorously avoided commenting on the case.  But this is not the “Bounty Revolt”.  The idea of ​​“helping the crew by expelling the captain” is clearly a mistake.  Rather, all lawyers are on the attacked ships. 

Criminal punishment is wrong, even if the bar association disciplinary for violating attorney ethics.  I would like to ask that the court is not allowed to make an innocent young lawyer a criminal by prosecution and police tricks.  We would like to ask that prosecution's criminal act is to deprive young lawyers in the future. 

I don't know what's behind this case.  However, His may have been rebellious because he often showed technical legal interpretations in program commentators.  Saying humans is simpler than expected.  The right to move humans is sex, money, hatred and love.  It's not that mysterious.  In Japan, where there are no judicial transactions, the conflict between lawyers and prosecutors is deepening. 

Because there is no place for communication, it is easy to cause wrinkles.  There is a difference between living on Mars and Venus.  There is a difference between hydrogen and spaghetti.  This time, the comment on Fuji Television's morning show would have bought hatred.  However, “witch hunting trials” without scientific evidence are not allowed.  Lawyers, unite with a sense of crisis.  The young lawyers would like to ask you to get up for his glorious his lawyer. 

The best argument is born naturally.  The words of Judge Powell.  It is up to you to drive away our opinions, but look at the reality.Again,we ask that Be Team and Our Hands Up To HELP ONE Lawyer in YOKOHAMA.

Managing partner,Lawyer.